Technical Advisory

RAG & LLM Architecture
Done Right

The difference between a demo and a production RAG system is enormous. We help engineering teams design retrieval pipelines, select models, tune chunking strategies, and build evaluation frameworks that actually work at scale.

40+ RAG systems designed and reviewed
94% Average retrieval accuracy in production deployments
65% Cost reduction vs. naive LLM-only approaches
What You Get

Architecture Deliverables

Technical artefacts your engineering team can implement immediately.

System Architecture Document

End-to-end design covering ingestion, chunking, embedding, vector storage, retrieval, reranking, and generation layers.

Chunking & Embedding Strategy

Optimal chunk sizes, overlap ratios, and embedding model selection benchmarked against your specific document corpus.

Vector Store Selection Guide

Comparative analysis of Pinecone, Weaviate, Qdrant, pgvector, and others โ€” with a recommendation for your scale and budget.

Retrieval Pipeline Design

Hybrid search configuration combining dense and sparse retrieval with reranking logic and fallback strategies.

Evaluation Framework

Automated test harnesses measuring retrieval precision, answer faithfulness, and hallucination rates with golden datasets.

Cost Modelling Workbook

Token-level cost projections across different LLM providers with recommendations for caching, batching, and model routing.

Our Process

Our Advisory Process

1

Corpus Analysis

We analyse your document types, volumes, update frequencies, and access patterns to inform every downstream design decision.

2

Prototype & Benchmark

We build a lightweight prototype to test chunking strategies, embedding models, and retrieval configurations against your real data.

3

Architecture Design

Based on benchmark results, we design the production architecture with clear technology choices and trade-off documentation.

4

Evaluation Setup

We create golden test sets and automated evaluation pipelines so your team can measure quality continuously after handoff.

5

Implementation Handoff

Detailed design docs, reference code, and a backlog of engineering tickets ready for your team to execute.

Ready to Start?

Building a RAG System? Get the Architecture Right First.

A few weeks of design advisory can save months of rework. Let us review your approach or design one from scratch.

Schedule Free Consultation
Who This Is For

Who This Is For

Engineering teams building knowledge-intensive AI applications.

FinTech Platforms

Build compliant Q&A systems over regulatory documents, policy manuals, and customer agreements.

Legal Tech Teams

Design retrieval systems for case law, contracts, and compliance documentation with citation accuracy.

Health Tech Builders

Architect RAG systems over clinical guidelines, drug databases, and patient records with strict accuracy requirements.

EdTech & Knowledge Platforms

Create intelligent tutoring and knowledge retrieval systems that surface accurate, contextual answers.

Why OpenMalo

Why OpenMalo for RAG & LLM

We have built enough RAG systems to know where they break โ€” and how to prevent it.

Benchmark-Driven Decisions
Every recommendation is backed by empirical benchmarks on your data, not generic blog-post advice.
Cost-Conscious Design
We optimise for production economics from day one โ€” caching, model routing, and token management are part of the architecture.
Retrieval Accuracy Focus
We obsess over retrieval quality because a RAG system is only as good as what it retrieves before generation.
Model-Agnostic Approach
OpenAI, Anthropic, Cohere, open-source โ€” we recommend based on your accuracy, latency, and cost requirements.
Evaluation as a First-Class Concern
Most teams build evaluation as an afterthought. We design it alongside the system so you can measure quality from day one.
Hallucination Mitigation
Grounding strategies, citation enforcement, and confidence scoring are embedded in every architecture we design.
Get Started

Get Expert RAG Architecture Guidance

Tell us about your use case and document corpus. We will assess whether RAG is the right approach and how to design it.

Free initial architecture review call
Benchmarks run on your actual data โ€” not toy datasets
Vendor-neutral model and infrastructure recommendations
Evaluation framework included in every engagement
Implementation-ready design documents
0/2000
Featured Case Study

RAG System Cuts Compliance Query Time by 80%

FinTech Case Study

Payment Processor Builds Regulatory Q&A System

A payment processing company needed their compliance team to query thousands of regulatory documents instantly instead of manually searching PDFs for hours.

80%
Reduction in average query resolution time
94.2%
Retrieval accuracy on regulatory questions
< 3s
Average end-to-end response latency
The Challenge

The Challenge

The compliance team spent hours searching through regulatory PDFs and internal policy documents to answer routine queries.

Over 12,000 regulatory documents across multiple jurisdictions
First RAG prototype had 61% retrieval accuracy โ€” unusable for compliance
Naive chunking destroyed table structures and cross-references
No evaluation framework to measure improvement systematically

Our Approach: We redesigned the chunking strategy to preserve document structure, implemented hybrid search with BM25 and dense retrieval, added a reranking layer, and built an evaluation harness with 500 golden question-answer pairs. Accuracy jumped from 61% to 94.2%.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Our core offering is architecture advisory and design. We can build a working prototype during the engagement, and offer implementation support as an add-on if your team needs hands-on help.